In many organizations, a gap between revenue leadership and finance has become a well-recognized challenge. This disconnect can lead to misaligned goals, wasted resources, and inefficiencies that harm the bottom line. Both functions—revenue leadership, which includes marketing, sales, and customer success, and finance, which is responsible for managing budgets and ensuring profitability—play pivotal roles in driving business success. However, the lack of communication, differing priorities, and distinct approaches to metrics often create friction. Understanding the underlying causes of this disconnect and implementing strategies to bridge the gap are essential for achieving business goals.
1. Different Languages, Different Metrics
At the core of the disconnect between revenue leadership and finance is a fundamental difference in how these teams define success. Revenue leadership typically focuses on top-line growth, customer acquisition, and market share expansion. They rely on metrics like lead generation, pipeline velocity, and customer lifetime value (CLTV). Their primary goal is to drive revenue and win market share, often through investments in marketing campaigns, sales teams, and technology.
On the other hand, finance departments prioritize profitability, cost efficiency, and return on investment (ROI). Finance teams track metrics such as cash flow, gross margin, and EBITDA. Their focus is to ensure that the company remains financially viable and meets its long-term goals.
These differing priorities often result in conflicting perspectives. While revenue leadership may advocate for more spending on marketing initiatives or hiring more salespeople to drive growth, finance may push back, concerned about the immediate costs and the impact on profitability. As Chris Walker points out, the lack of alignment often leads to scenarios where revenue leadership insists, "We don’t have enough budget," while finance is primarily concerned with reducing costs to ensure positive financial outcomes.
2. Misaligned Incentives and KPIs
One of the key issues contributing to the disconnect is the misalignment of incentives and KPIs between revenue leadership and finance. Sales teams, for instance, may be incentivized to close as many deals as possible, even if the long-term profitability of those deals is questionable. Marketing teams may be focused on generating a high volume of leads without necessarily considering the quality of those leads.
Meanwhile, finance is more concerned with efficient allocation of resources and ensuring that every dollar spent contributes meaningfully to the bottom line. The problem arises when revenue leadership is measured by short-term performance metrics—such as quarterly revenue targets—while finance takes a long-term view of the company’s financial health.
This misalignment can lead to friction, as finance often questions the ROI of investments made by revenue leadership, especially in areas like marketing where attribution can be difficult to quantify. Walker highlights how finance teams tend to view marketing investments with skepticism, as they struggle to understand the true impact of these initiatives on business performance. This results in a lack of trust between the two departments, further widening the gap.
3. Bottom-Up vs. Top-Down Reporting Structures
Another major cause of the disconnect is the difference in how both teams report on performance. Revenue leadership often builds their metrics and reporting in a bottom-up fashion. They track performance by looking at specific channels—such as digital marketing, events, or sales teams—and then aggregate those metrics into broader reports that often paint a picture of success. However, this bottom-up reporting process often fails to account for top-level business metrics, such as overall growth rate, customer acquisition costs (CAC), or sales and marketing efficiency.
Finance, on the other hand, typically uses a top-down reporting structure, starting with high-level financial metrics and breaking them down into specific cost centers. This top-down approach often highlights inefficiencies in resource allocation, such as high CAC or bloated marketing budgets. The challenge arises when these two reporting structures—bottom-up for revenue leadership and top-down for finance—don’t align.
For example, revenue leadership may report success based on channel-specific performance, such as the number of leads generated or social media engagement. However, finance will look at overall business performance and may see that despite all these reported successes, the company’s CAC payback period remains high, or the return on marketing investment is below expectations.
4. Lack of Understanding of Each Other’s Functions
A significant part of the disconnect also stems from a lack of understanding between the two departments. Revenue leadership often doesn’t have a deep understanding of financial models or the broader business context that finance is working within. They may not appreciate the impact that certain decisions—like overspending on marketing—can have on cash flow, EBITDA, or even the company’s ability to raise future rounds of funding.
On the flip side, finance teams often lack a nuanced understanding of how revenue is generated in a modern business environment. They may view marketing and sales as cost centers, rather than critical growth drivers, leading them to underappreciate the long-term value of customer acquisition or brand-building activities.
Chris Walker suggests that this disconnect stems from a lack of cross-functional expertise. Finance departments don’t understand the complexities of go-to-market strategies well enough to challenge or optimize them, while revenue leadership doesn’t have the financial expertise needed to make decisions that align with long-term business profitability.
Fixing the Disconnect: Key Strategies for Alignment
While the disconnect between revenue leadership and finance is a widespread issue, it is not insurmountable. Several strategies can be employed to foster alignment and drive better collaboration between the two functions.
1. Adopt a Unified Reporting Framework
To align the objectives of revenue leadership and finance, companies need to adopt a unified reporting framework that incorporates both financial and go-to-market metrics. This framework should start with top-level business metrics—such as growth rate, net revenue retention, and CAC payback periods—and then break those down into more granular KPIs that both teams can use to measure success.
For example, rather than focusing solely on the number of leads generated, marketing teams should be accountable for metrics that tie directly to business outcomes, such as the cost per qualified lead or the pipeline generated by marketing efforts. Similarly, sales teams should be measured not just on deals closed but also on metrics that reflect the long-term profitability of those deals, such as customer lifetime value.
By aligning metrics across both teams, companies can ensure that revenue leadership and finance are working toward the same goals.
2. Foster Cross-Functional Collaboration
One of the most effective ways to bridge the gap between revenue leadership and finance is to foster more cross-functional collaboration. This could involve having revenue leadership participate in financial planning meetings, where they can gain a better understanding of the broader business context and financial goals.
Conversely, finance teams should be encouraged to attend go-to-market strategy sessions, where they can learn more about the revenue-generating activities that drive growth. By increasing the visibility of each department’s objectives and challenges, companies can create a culture of mutual understanding and trust.
3. Focus on ROI and Business Outcomes
To build trust between revenue leadership and finance, it’s essential to shift the focus from activity-based metrics (such as leads or website visits) to business outcomes (such as revenue, profitability, and customer retention). This shift requires revenue leadership to become more accountable for the financial impact of their decisions and to make a concerted effort to demonstrate the ROI of their initiatives.
At the same time, finance teams need to recognize the long-term value of customer acquisition and brand-building activities. They should work with revenue leadership to develop realistic models for measuring the ROI of these initiatives and to ensure that budget allocations are aligned with long-term business goals.
4. Develop Cross-Functional Expertise
Finally, to truly bridge the gap between revenue leadership and finance, companies need to invest in developing cross-functional expertise. This could involve providing training for finance teams on go-to-market strategies or offering financial modeling courses for revenue leaders. The goal is to create a shared understanding of each department’s goals and constraints, enabling more informed decision-making and better collaboration.
Conclusion
The disconnect between revenue leadership and finance is a common challenge for many organizations, but it can be addressed with the right strategies. By adopting a unified reporting framework, fostering cross-functional collaboration, focusing on business outcomes, and developing cross-functional expertise, companies can ensure that both teams are aligned and working toward the same goals. This alignment is critical for driving long-term business success and achieving sustainable growth in today’s competitive market.
.png)
.png)
.png)
